Tears Dont Fall

I am not an art critic, and I will try to be as objective, and also as sincere, as I can with my critique. Originally I found it to be evidently a commercial work, very commercial for my taste and too symmetric -a symmetric composition usually is boring.

That with a very first sight. However, when noticed that the arms of this, I will call him "performer" merge with the potent shinnning at his back and form a sort of spiral or whirlpool around him that magnifies his figure, and conferes hot him -or her, 'cause is slight and agile, as a woman - a majestic presence, I thought that, with no place for discussion, this was the portrait of a star's charisma in action